Molders Meet Challenges of Micro-Scale Part Making

Some medical microparts measure less than a cubic millimeter. But micromolders and their customers want
to get smaller.

William Leventon

As medical devices continue their shrinking act, manufacturers are coming up with part designs that are tinier — and
tougher to mold — than ever. “Customers are asking for smaller, lighter, thinner components,” observes Stuart
Kaplan, president of Makuta Technics Inc. (Columbus, IN), one of a small number of companies that mold so-called
“microparts.”

In the medical industry, the list of microparts includes sensors, catheter tips, tubes, and implants. Demand for these
super-small parts is growing rapidly, notes Donna Tully Bibber, vice president of sales for Minitaure Tool & Die Inc.
(Charlton, MA), a maker of steel micromolds. “We’re being inundated with really funky, small applications that we
would have giggled at not long ago. But now that we can make them, we’re not giggling anymore,” says Tully Bibber,
whose company has made micromolds for parts less than 2 millimeters long.

Though there’s much talk about micromolding these days, there’s no set definition of the term. “Plenty of people say
they do it, but they really just mean that they make small parts,” says Tully Bibber.

Miniature Tool & Die defines a micropart as anything smaller than a single plastic pellet or weighing less than a tenth
of a gram. But current micromolding technology can do much better than that, turning out parts just a few ten
thousandths of an inch thick and weighing less than a thousandth of a gram.

How small is small enough? We’re not there yet. Micromolders predict that demand and technology will continue to
drive down part sizes — perhaps to the point where molds can no longer be used for molding.

Micropart Machines

To manufacture microparts, the molding industry depends on a new crop of injection machines, molds, and part-
handling systems. Some micromolders use screw-and-barrel molding machines similar to conventional machines
except that the components are much smaller. Makuta, for example, uses screw-and-barrel injection systems with
diameters ranging from 14 to 20 millimeters and nozzle orifices of 1.5 millimeters. These systems can produce shots
weighing less than a gram, according to Kaplan.

Another micromolder in the screw-and-barrel camp is Empire Precision Plastics Inc. (Rochester, NY), which has made
parts weighing less than 0.0008 gram. The key to molding on this scale is getting the right amount of plastic into the
mold — also known as “dosing the shot,” according to Neil Elli, president of Empire Precision. When molders don’t
accurately dose their shots, Elli explains, they risk “overpacking” their parts, which can cause the parts to stick in the
mold or even break the mold.

According to Elli, molders that want precise shot dosing can buy electric injection machines with servomotors capable
of very accurate screw positioning. Or, if they plan to stick with hydraulic machines, they can install a valve gate that
shuts when the right amount of plastic has been injected into the mold.

A new option for micromolders is an injection machine that replaces the screw with a motor-driven plunger. Named for
the part sizes it produces, the Sesame is a small electro-pneumatic micromolding machine made by Hull Corp.
(Warminster, PA). The machine can mold 20 sesame-seed-size parts from a single plastic pellet, according to Bob
Boland, Hull’s sales manager.

Instead of screwing action, the Sesame uses a tiny plunger to push material into the mold. This plunger, which can be
as small as 1.5 millimeters in diameter, is driven by an electric servomotor. To ensure accurate shot sizes, the
servomotor can control plunger position to within 5 microns. Total injection time can be as little as 0.020 second,
Boland says.

To keep plastic flowing through its small passages, the Sesame relies on a combination of high injection pressures
(up to 50,000 psi) and high melt temperatures. High temperatures degrade materials during the time they spend in a
conventional machine. But the Sesame is designed to minimize so-called “residence time.” “Material may be in our
machine a couple of minutes, compared to a couple of hours in a regular machine,” notes Andy Leopold, vice
president of Medical Murray Inc. (Buffalo Grove, IL), which developed the Sesame technology and licensed it to Hull.

What accounts for the difference in residence times? During a molding cycle, the Sesame holds an extremely small
amount of material — far less than the smallest screw-and-barrel machine. “Even a short screw would hold 20 times
more material” than the Sesame, Leopold says.

One way to get material out of the machine before it degrades is to use a large runner and sprue. Sometimes,
Leopold says, the runner and sprue are so big that the part material is less than 1 percent of the shot. That means
more than 99 percent of the shot material is wasted.

Worse, the manufacturer loses control of the part-molding process. “What you’re actually doing is molding the sprue
and runner, and the part becomes a kind of byproduct,” Leopold says.

So the Sesame is designed to let molders use a smaller runner and sprue, which gives them more control over the
amount of plastic and pressure used to form the part itself. A smaller runner and sprue also means less material
waste. While screw-and-barrel systems waste as much as 99.7 percent of the shot material, the Sesame wastes less
than 80 percent, according to Leopold. This is particularly important when molding expensive materials like
biodegradable plastics, which cost as much as $10 a gram.

The Sesame can handle any type of moldable plastic, as well as silicone rubber. Super-small medical parts molded by
the machine include:
  • Polyethylene catheter tips with a volume of 0.16 cubic millimeter
  • 0.0001-gram TPE tubes for a microsurgery device
  • Silicone rubber tear duct plugs with an outside diameter of 0.61 millimeter

The Micromold Challenge

Of all the challenges in a micromolding operation, Leopold puts mold-making at the top of the list. Dennis Tully would
probably agree. “In the macro world, even tight tolerance tools are much more forgiving than they are in the micro
world, where a 0.0005-inch variation could kill a project,” says Tully, vice president of engineering at Miniature Tool &
Die, which makes molds for parts weighing as little as 0.0006 gram. “With the small sizes and tight tolerances, there’s
really no room for error in the micro world.”

Micro-scale mold-making has gotten a boost from recent developments in electronic signal sensing, part
measurement, and process control. According to Kaplan, these improvements allow moldmakers to hold tolerances of
±10 nanometers while cutting mold steel.

To make super-small features, moldmakers sometimes turn to unconventional processes such as reactive ion
etching. In RIE, moldmakers use reactive ions to knock metal atoms out of a mold surface, explains Jonathan Colton,
a micromolding researcher at the Georgia Institute of Technology (Atlanta).

Other moldmakers use lasers to make extremely small features. For example, some micromolds require holes so
small that they can’t be made with an electronic discharge machine (EDM). In cases like this, Murray uses lasers to
burn mold holes as small as 0.001 inch in diameter.

On a more conventional scale, some high-volume operations use 64-cavity molds. But such molds won’t do for
micromolding, Leopold contends. “You lose control of all the individual cavities, so the parts don’t come out the
same,” he says. For micromolding, Leopold prefers two- or four-cavity molds, which yield more repeatable parts.

Micro-scale parts can be ruined by a rough mold surface, so moldmakers must pay close attention to surface finish.
An EDM surface that looks smooth from a distance will probably look much rougher when you zoom in on it, Leopold
notes. To smooth these surfaces, moldmakers often polish them with brass or copper tools. Another option is plating
the mold surface with nickel or tin. Elli recommends plating when the molding thermoplastic contains an abrasive
material.

Once microparts have been formed in the mold, they must be removed and placed in containers. To manage this
process efficiently, some micromolders have developed clever micropart-handling systems. At Makuta, for example,
production lines can run unmanned thanks to automated venturi systems that suck microparts out of their molds and
place them in tubes.

Whatever microparts are on your drawing board, you should bring molders into the design process as early as
possible. “A lot of times, an engineer will design something that we can’t tool,” Elli says. “So we have to be part of the
design team. That way, we can help customers design parts that are manufacturable.”

Material Considerations

One of the most important decision facing micropart designers is what material to use. Colton recommends plastics
with a high melt-flow index and low viscosity at processing temperatures. He also prefers low-temperature polymers
that spare molding machinery from exposure to excessive heat.

Elli avoids plastics with glass-fiber reinforcing that doesn’t flow easily through long, thin-wall mold features. And he
sticks with premium suppliers that can deliver material with consistent melt flow from one lot to the next. “When you’re
making microparts, the cost of the plastic isn’t significant,” he says. “So you shouldn’t be trying to save a few cents on
materials.”

Though material costs are usually negligible, the cost of specialized machines, molds, and secondary equipment
makes micromolding “a pretty expensive process,” Elli notes. So OEMs should be prepared to pay as much for
microparts as they do for larger components.

“I make parts that weigh a third of a gram and are just as expensive as parts that weigh 4 grams,” Elli says. “Buyers
tell me that they expect [microparts] to cost less because they need less plastic. But there’s no correlation between
size and cost.”

Getting Smaller

Though today’s medical microparts seem incredibly small, demand from device manufacturers will drive part sizes
down even more. To get smaller from here, Kaplan thinks micromolders will rely primarily on new mold-making
technologies. “That’s really where the magic is,” he says.

One such technology could be LIGA, a lithography technique developed in Germany. Already, Tully notes, companies
are producing LIGA structures that could be converted into molding cavities. “That technology allows [mold] sizes to
be miniscule — probably much smaller than anything plastic will flow through,” he says.

To accommodate super-small part-forming processes, materials could be inserted in a new way. For example,
different monomers could be separately injected into a mold, where they would combine to form polymers. This way,
Colton says, “you’re not trying to shove in big molecules. You’re using smaller molecules and then reacting them
once they get in the mold.”

At the sub-micron level, Colton believes melt-and-squeeze methods of shaping plastic may reach their limit. Then, he
says, manufacturers may turn to reactive part-forming techniques. For example, a manufacturer could fire a couple of
lasers into a box filled with gas. At the point where the laser beams intersect, the energy would produce a reaction
that causes a part to form. According to Colton, this is one way people could realize a long-discussed dream: molding
without a mold.

This article appeared in Medical Device & Diagnostic Industry magazine.